Comment - We should push back on the requirement to provide paper documents for the upcoming audit - all of this information can be pulled online. Priinting everything costs us dollars and wasted man-hours.
Answer:
Thursday, December 13, 2012
29 Jun 12 - Water Fountain
Comment: Let's look to see if we can put a water fountain in Bldg. 624
Answer: Installed approx August 2012.
Answer: Installed approx August 2012.
29 Jun 12 - Stairwell
Comment: Have Safety adn DPW take a look at the north set of stairs in the RMO Bld. Employees feel this stairwell is unsafe.
Answer:
Answer:
29 Jun 12 - Liberty Transit Advertisiing
Comment: Let's re-advertise the LC transit routes, cost using all ofour media for about a month.
Answer:
Answer:
29 Jun 12 - Traffic Sign
Comment: Take down the no left turn sign at the stop sign to the exit of our parking lot that empties out onto 6th street.
Answer:
Answer:
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
01 Aug 2012 (HAAF) - CES Q&A
CES Background: The CES order of merit listing (OML) was established after:
1) The development of Garrison policy letter #14, dated 01 May 2012, which outlines the priorities for CES
2) Completion of a 100% survey of the garrison workforce in December 2009 to determine our Garrison's CES training status.
Comment: Who establishes the CES OML?
Answer: The CES order of merit listiing was established and is maintained using the priority definitions outlined in the Army Civilian Education Policy dated Nov 2006 (i.e. priorities 1, 2, and 3): Grade, Service computation date for total civilian service, then compassionate considerations. Ultimately, the Garrison Commander approves the CES OML after it is provided for his approval based on the above criterion.
Comment: Who is eligible to be on the CES OML?
Answer: All employees are eligible but, the priority 2 and 3 employees are to be trained following 100% of the priority 1 employees.
Comment: When are employees briefed on the OML (monthly counseling)?
Answer: This is generally up to the supervisor. The information results of the CES OML are analyzed bi-weekly and the inputs are provided by the directorate's training coordinators. This is a great topic for quarterly counseling.
1) The development of Garrison policy letter #14, dated 01 May 2012, which outlines the priorities for CES
2) Completion of a 100% survey of the garrison workforce in December 2009 to determine our Garrison's CES training status.
Comment: Who establishes the CES OML?
Answer: The CES order of merit listiing was established and is maintained using the priority definitions outlined in the Army Civilian Education Policy dated Nov 2006 (i.e. priorities 1, 2, and 3): Grade, Service computation date for total civilian service, then compassionate considerations. Ultimately, the Garrison Commander approves the CES OML after it is provided for his approval based on the above criterion.
Comment: Who is eligible to be on the CES OML?
Answer: All employees are eligible but, the priority 2 and 3 employees are to be trained following 100% of the priority 1 employees.
Comment: When are employees briefed on the OML (monthly counseling)?
Answer: This is generally up to the supervisor. The information results of the CES OML are analyzed bi-weekly and the inputs are provided by the directorate's training coordinators. This is a great topic for quarterly counseling.
01 Aug 2012 (HAAF) - VERA/VSIP Q&A
Comment: Several employees stated they had applied for VERA/VSIP but received no feedback from their supervisor/director.
Answer: RMO receives VSIP requests from the directors only. It is a management decision whether or not to offer VSIP to an employee. It is voluntary on the employees' part. VSIP is not an entitlement. In this era of civilian strength reductions, the directors are offering more VERA/VSIPS than any other time in recent years. We offered a total of 62 so far in FY12 alone. Every employee should have a supervisor look them in the eye and tell them if a VSIP is going forward or not. This is a great topic for quarterly counseling if nothing else.
Comment: Are employees VERA/VISP requests denied because supervisors/directors are afraid to lose the position authorization on the TDA?
Answer: In order to get a VSIP approved, a position must be abolished. Since we have over 100 over-hires right now, RMO is working to abolish the over-hire position instead of the key positions on teh TDA. Sometimes supervisors don't want to lose a valuable employee, as it may cripple their organization. Offering VSIP is a Directors decision. The director recommends to the GC who then recommends to the RD and the RD approves ro disapproves. So far this FY, Region has disapproved zero.
Comment: Who has the authority to stop a VERA/VSIP request?
Answer: The director may start a VERA/VSIP based on the employees volunteering an interest in taking it. The director may also decide to stop a VERA/VSIP request. The GC sould stop it, but he has not disapproved one yet. The RD could stop it, bue he has not disapproved one yet either.
Comment: What mechanism is there to provide feedback to employees on their request as it moves through the system.
Answer: If a Director submits a VERA/VSIP packet to go forward, then RMO now has the task to let the employee know within 24 hours and whether it is approved or disapproved. None that have been submitted by directors have been disapproved. However, VERA/VSIP packets not submitted by the directors are not considered for approval or disapproval. Again, every supervisor should counsel their employees face to face on whether their packet will go forward or not.
Comment: Are position authorizations deleted when VERA/VSIP is approved?
Answer: Yes a position is deleted, but as long as we have over-hires, RMO will delete the over-hire position, not a position with an authorization.
Answer: RMO receives VSIP requests from the directors only. It is a management decision whether or not to offer VSIP to an employee. It is voluntary on the employees' part. VSIP is not an entitlement. In this era of civilian strength reductions, the directors are offering more VERA/VSIPS than any other time in recent years. We offered a total of 62 so far in FY12 alone. Every employee should have a supervisor look them in the eye and tell them if a VSIP is going forward or not. This is a great topic for quarterly counseling if nothing else.
Comment: Are employees VERA/VISP requests denied because supervisors/directors are afraid to lose the position authorization on the TDA?
Answer: In order to get a VSIP approved, a position must be abolished. Since we have over 100 over-hires right now, RMO is working to abolish the over-hire position instead of the key positions on teh TDA. Sometimes supervisors don't want to lose a valuable employee, as it may cripple their organization. Offering VSIP is a Directors decision. The director recommends to the GC who then recommends to the RD and the RD approves ro disapproves. So far this FY, Region has disapproved zero.
Comment: Who has the authority to stop a VERA/VSIP request?
Answer: The director may start a VERA/VSIP based on the employees volunteering an interest in taking it. The director may also decide to stop a VERA/VSIP request. The GC sould stop it, but he has not disapproved one yet. The RD could stop it, bue he has not disapproved one yet either.
Comment: What mechanism is there to provide feedback to employees on their request as it moves through the system.
Answer: If a Director submits a VERA/VSIP packet to go forward, then RMO now has the task to let the employee know within 24 hours and whether it is approved or disapproved. None that have been submitted by directors have been disapproved. However, VERA/VSIP packets not submitted by the directors are not considered for approval or disapproval. Again, every supervisor should counsel their employees face to face on whether their packet will go forward or not.
Comment: Are position authorizations deleted when VERA/VSIP is approved?
Answer: Yes a position is deleted, but as long as we have over-hires, RMO will delete the over-hire position, not a position with an authorization.
01 Aug 2012 (HAAF) - FSBP Q&A
Comment: What is the future of FSBP?
Answer: The FSBP is being turned over to Army units from civilian management effective 01 Oct 2012. The civilians currently managing the barracks are permanent over-hires.
Comment: What happens to these civilian employees/over-hires when the barracks are turned back over to the Army?
Answer: The over-hires in the FSBP program are going to have to find new positions for work. They can help find new jobs, but it is Garrison's responsibility to figure out where they can work instead of FSBP.
Comment: What happens to permanent over-hires if there is a RIF before the transition of the FSBP?
Answer: If there is a RIF, some of them are in danger of being let go and some are not, it depends on the rules of the RIF, their seniority, and their Veteran's preference. We won't know who is in danger of being RIF-ed until we conduct the mock RIF over the next couple of weeks.
Answer: The FSBP is being turned over to Army units from civilian management effective 01 Oct 2012. The civilians currently managing the barracks are permanent over-hires.
Comment: What happens to these civilian employees/over-hires when the barracks are turned back over to the Army?
Answer: The over-hires in the FSBP program are going to have to find new positions for work. They can help find new jobs, but it is Garrison's responsibility to figure out where they can work instead of FSBP.
Comment: What happens to permanent over-hires if there is a RIF before the transition of the FSBP?
Answer: If there is a RIF, some of them are in danger of being let go and some are not, it depends on the rules of the RIF, their seniority, and their Veteran's preference. We won't know who is in danger of being RIF-ed until we conduct the mock RIF over the next couple of weeks.
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
07 May 12: 1SG Course
Comment: LE/Physical Security/Fire were all taken out of the Cdr/1SG course. Need to see if we can get them back in.
Answer: Contacting POC to reengage (Mr. Garrett, Division training office)
Answer: Contacting POC to reengage (Mr. Garrett, Division training office)
07 May 12: Blotter
Comment: Was told IMCOM HQs on blotter list--explain why to GC
Answer: Blotter Distribution list has been changed to meet most recent guidance.
Answer: Blotter Distribution list has been changed to meet most recent guidance.
Monday, June 11, 2012
07 May 12: 15th Street PT Traffic
Comment: Issues w/PT and traffic during 15th St Shift changes. a) roadblock not in correct place, b0 is 15th St a protected route
Answer: Fire station has changed hours to deconflict w/PT
Answer: Fire station has changed hours to deconflict w/PT
07 May 12: 4833 Course
Comment: I would like DES to build a 4833 education course to take to units to help with our 4833 problems/concerns.
Answer:
Answer:
07 May 2012: 4833 Tracking
Comment: Upcoming change to the AR will give 4833 tracking back to SJA - need to discuss transition with SJA and DES
Answer:
Answer:
Friday, May 4, 2012
28 Apr 2012: Housing Gate
Comment: 144 Housing Gate - will there be a west bound turn lane in the project that DPW has planned for later this year?
Answer: 02 May 12 - No, left turns are unsafe at this intersection unless a signal is provided, and a signal is not included in the project. The project will provide deterrents against the numerous illegal u-turns that currently occur in the borning between 0800 and 0900. Instead of making u-turns, Soldiers from the housing area need to use their secondary entrance into the 4IBCT or Gate 3 (rather than Gate 5) to enter the main cantonment area.
Answer: 02 May 12 - No, left turns are unsafe at this intersection unless a signal is provided, and a signal is not included in the project. The project will provide deterrents against the numerous illegal u-turns that currently occur in the borning between 0800 and 0900. Instead of making u-turns, Soldiers from the housing area need to use their secondary entrance into the 4IBCT or Gate 3 (rather than Gate 5) to enter the main cantonment area.
06 Apr 2012: CDC Crosswalk
Comment: Need for a crosswalk at our big CDC. (unsure which one specifically--check them all)
Answer: 02 May 12 - All CDCs were checked. CDC on Davis Avenue was the only one where a crosswalk was deemed necessary. Conceptual design is complete with an estimated cost of $7,600.
Update: 08 May 12 - DPW recommending no crosswalk b/c it is essentially to nowhere (nothing on opposite side--sidewalk etc.)
Answer: 02 May 12 - All CDCs were checked. CDC on Davis Avenue was the only one where a crosswalk was deemed necessary. Conceptual design is complete with an estimated cost of $7,600.
Update: 08 May 12 - DPW recommending no crosswalk b/c it is essentially to nowhere (nothing on opposite side--sidewalk etc.)
06 Apr 2012: Gate 3
Comment: Need a light at Gate 3.
Answer: No light is necessary based on traffic flow and density (& reduced speed limit)
Answer: No light is necessary based on traffic flow and density (& reduced speed limit)
06 Apr 2012: Light Timing
Comment: Problems with the timing of the light at 144 and Sundbury.
Answer: 08 Jun 12 - Lights have been adjusted.
Answer: 08 Jun 12 - Lights have been adjusted.
06 Apr 2012: Tank Trail Network
Comment: Can we keep convoys off of 144 and make them use the tank trail network?
Answer: No---safer and efficient to continue on 144.
Answer: No---safer and efficient to continue on 144.
06 Apr 2012: Digital Finger Printing
Comment: Digital finger print machines in security division are down causing us to send people off post at a cost for this service
Answer: 03 May 12 - At no time were customers referred off post. machines were down due to technical issues but both FS and HAAF's have been resolved and are fully operational.
Answer: 03 May 12 - At no time were customers referred off post. machines were down due to technical issues but both FS and HAAF's have been resolved and are fully operational.
28 Apr 2012: GSA Vehicles
Comment: GSA Vehicles - problem with supervisors holding on to credit cards. Without this the operator cannot get towed or repaired.
Answer: 04 May 12 - Each vehicle has a credit card and is signed for by dispatcher. Supervisors should not take this away and TMP should be notified in such instances. Authorization o fthe card will be pre-approved via TMP in the event of a vehicle malfunction.
Answer: 04 May 12 - Each vehicle has a credit card and is signed for by dispatcher. Supervisors should not take this away and TMP should be notified in such instances. Authorization o fthe card will be pre-approved via TMP in the event of a vehicle malfunction.
28 Apr 2012: Forklift Repair
Comment: Issue with FOrklift repair times - need to brief at staff call just like a deadline report.
Answer: Acknowledged and tracking status
Answer: Acknowledged and tracking status
28 Apr 2012: Crates & Pallets
Comment: Question on who will be building our crates and pallets - apparently we just changed something.
Answer: 04 May 12 - Due to only DOL carpenter retiring and no backfill, an open workorder has been submitted to DPW for fabrication.
Answer: 04 May 12 - Due to only DOL carpenter retiring and no backfill, an open workorder has been submitted to DPW for fabrication.
06 Apr 2012: School Bus Stop
Comment: Why do we have a school bus stop at Harmon and 16th?
Answer: 11 Apr 12 - There's a bus stop on the corner of Harmon and 16th streets. A Liberty Co school bus picks up two students at that location who are in the Ombudsman program (alternative school); one is a middle school stdent, the other is a high school student.
Answer: 11 Apr 12 - There's a bus stop on the corner of Harmon and 16th streets. A Liberty Co school bus picks up two students at that location who are in the Ombudsman program (alternative school); one is a middle school stdent, the other is a high school student.
06 Apr 2012: Pond 1 Pavilion
Comment: Repair Pond 1 Pavillions
Answer: 02 May 12 - Work Order to remove the pavilions because of safety concerns. Work Order # SF 000701J, was submitted 05 Jul 11. Per DPW WO is on hold
Answer: 18 May 12 - WO has moved to estimators.
Answer: 08 Jun 12 - WO was sent to DPW on 08 Jun for DPW to schedule and execute. DPW expected to complete the week of 11 Jun.
Answer: 22 Jun 12 - Pavillions removed.
Answer: 02 May 12 - Work Order to remove the pavilions because of safety concerns. Work Order # SF 000701J, was submitted 05 Jul 11. Per DPW WO is on hold
Answer: 18 May 12 - WO has moved to estimators.
Answer: 08 Jun 12 - WO was sent to DPW on 08 Jun for DPW to schedule and execute. DPW expected to complete the week of 11 Jun.
Answer: 22 Jun 12 - Pavillions removed.
06 Apr 2012: Recreation Areas
Comment: Ensure we are opening up recreation areas on long weekends.
Answer: 02 May 12 - Training areas open for recreation use are loaded into the HunTrac system within 24 hrs of receipt from DPTMS. DPW, Forestry will adjust the open areas as burns are cancelled.
Answer: 02 May 12 - Training areas open for recreation use are loaded into the HunTrac system within 24 hrs of receipt from DPTMS. DPW, Forestry will adjust the open areas as burns are cancelled.
06 Apr 2012: Phone Check In
Comment: Phone checking process (outdoor rec) needs to be streamlined.
Answer: 02 May 12 - Outdoor Recreation will schedule a meeting with Fish adn Wildlife and Game Wardens prior to 15 May to discuss possible ways to streamline. Currently all information provided on the website is required by FS hunting and fishing regulation.
Update: 21 May 12 - Input from the DPW Fish & Wildlife Branch, DES Game Wardens & the FMWR Ourdoor Recreation team all indicate that the current checkin/out process meets the requriements to validate information from the sportsmen and help individuals select the safe, legal training area for their recreation needs. No further action required.
Answer: 02 May 12 - Outdoor Recreation will schedule a meeting with Fish adn Wildlife and Game Wardens prior to 15 May to discuss possible ways to streamline. Currently all information provided on the website is required by FS hunting and fishing regulation.
Update: 21 May 12 - Input from the DPW Fish & Wildlife Branch, DES Game Wardens & the FMWR Ourdoor Recreation team all indicate that the current checkin/out process meets the requriements to validate information from the sportsmen and help individuals select the safe, legal training area for their recreation needs. No further action required.
28 April 2012: IEPP
Comment: IEPP question: Employee is in a GS5 slot now due to a RIF somewhere else. She would like to apply for some IEPP GS6 & 7 positions because she has worked at the level in the past but the rules do not allow this - are there exceptions?
Answer: Negative---this becomes a promotion versus a reassignment and IMCOM policy on promotions take precedence.
Answer: Negative---this becomes a promotion versus a reassignment and IMCOM policy on promotions take precedence.
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
07 Mar 2012: Flex Schedule
Comment: Employees are interested in bringing back the FLEX schedule - remind me what the current policy is.
Answer: Provided to the GC 07 Mar.
Answer: Provided to the GC 07 Mar.
24 Mar 2012: Fire Station Manning
Comment: I was told that we do not have manning or equipment for the two temp fire stations we are planning. I need the laydown and recommended way ahead.
Answer: Met with GC 31 March.
Answer: Met with GC 31 March.
07 Mar 2012: Speeding at DOL
Comment: Problem with Soldiers speeding thru the DOL parking lot - what can we do?
Answer: Corrective actions provided to DOL and worked with CSM
Answer: Corrective actions provided to DOL and worked with CSM
07 Mar 2012: Flex Schedule
Comment: Employees are interested in bringing back the FLEX schedule - remind me what the current policy is.
Answer: Provided to the GC 07 Mar.
Answer: Provided to the GC 07 Mar.
17 Feb 2012: Security Clearances
Comment: G2 is gettin in our way for doing what we must for security clearance suspensions. Scott I need for you to look into this.
Answer: PSI office, (Ms. Washington), spoke with the 3rd ID SSO, MAJ Russ and we mutually agreed that once MP Blotters were received, if there were any personnel listed that were read on I would let him know before suspension. At this time the G2 is not hindering the Security Division from completing their mission
Answer: PSI office, (Ms. Washington), spoke with the 3rd ID SSO, MAJ Russ and we mutually agreed that once MP Blotters were received, if there were any personnel listed that were read on I would let him know before suspension. At this time the G2 is not hindering the Security Division from completing their mission
07 Mar 2012: Rebuilds
Comment: Request to do Component rebuilds here
Answer: 10 Mar 12: The Army incorporated a program called National Maintenance Program (NMP) many years ago to consolidate the component rebuilds to a single Source of Repairs for quality purposes. We used to conduct component repairs prior to the establishment of NMP but lost the authorization to continue. The LMP program is not beneficial for us to participate in because it does not guarantee workloads and only funds the program for completed work. Thus, we have to fund mechanics and maintain the work force without a guarantee of any work.
Answer: 10 Mar 12: The Army incorporated a program called National Maintenance Program (NMP) many years ago to consolidate the component rebuilds to a single Source of Repairs for quality purposes. We used to conduct component repairs prior to the establishment of NMP but lost the authorization to continue. The LMP program is not beneficial for us to participate in because it does not guarantee workloads and only funds the program for completed work. Thus, we have to fund mechanics and maintain the work force without a guarantee of any work.
07 Mar 2012: Job Applications
Comment: Concern with individuals writing PDs and then applying for the job - are we doing this?
Answer: 10 Mar 12: When position descriptions are developed or revised employees performing these or similar duties are consulted to insure position descriptions are accurate. However, management has overall responsibility for developing and submitting PD’s.
Answer: 10 Mar 12: When position descriptions are developed or revised employees performing these or similar duties are consulted to insure position descriptions are accurate. However, management has overall responsibility for developing and submitting PD’s.
07 Mar 2012: Management
Comment: Micromanagement Problems
Answer: 10 Mar 12: Leaders provide broad guidance and managers determine specific tasks and standards to ensure mission accomplishment. As an ISO certified organization work tasks are detailed and codified to ensure work is uniform and performed to standard.
Answer: 10 Mar 12: Leaders provide broad guidance and managers determine specific tasks and standards to ensure mission accomplishment. As an ISO certified organization work tasks are detailed and codified to ensure work is uniform and performed to standard.
07 Mar 2012: CECOM
Comment: CECOM team is here doing work that we should have done during the deployment.
Answer: 10 Mar 12: CECOM has established a team to install and check the serviceability of the entire communication systems prior to the reissue of LBE to the units. This ensures that the units are receiving equipment back as a system complete and serviceable. When we perform LBE, maintenance on the equipment we insure all communication equipment that is installed on the equipment is serviceable but we lack components of the system to test the entire system.
Answer: 10 Mar 12: CECOM has established a team to install and check the serviceability of the entire communication systems prior to the reissue of LBE to the units. This ensures that the units are receiving equipment back as a system complete and serviceable. When we perform LBE, maintenance on the equipment we insure all communication equipment that is installed on the equipment is serviceable but we lack components of the system to test the entire system.
07 Mar 2012: AOAP
Comment: Can we get an AOAP test center here?
Answer: 10 Mar 12: We used to have an AOAP Lab at HAAF that supported FSGA and HAAF but the department of the Army consolidated Labs and created regional Labs to minimize the AOAP cost to the Army.
Answer: 10 Mar 12: We used to have an AOAP Lab at HAAF that supported FSGA and HAAF but the department of the Army consolidated Labs and created regional Labs to minimize the AOAP cost to the Army.
07 Mar 2012: MRAP Mechanics
Comment: Concern with the number of mechanics we have trained to work on MRAPs.
Answer: 10 Mar12: We have three personnel that went to the training and we are currently in the process to get additional mechanics trained. DOL responded to an ASC tasking requesting our requirements. Additionally, we submitted a ROM to ASC a while back to get seven additional personnel trained.
Answer: 10 Mar12: We have three personnel that went to the training and we are currently in the process to get additional mechanics trained. DOL responded to an ASC tasking requesting our requirements. Additionally, we submitted a ROM to ASC a while back to get seven additional personnel trained.
07 Mar 2012: PT at DOL
Comment: Problem with PT and DOL employees getting to work - not sure I understand this one.
Answer: 10 Mar: Building 2916 is located in the 3rd ID PT area. A route has been established that enables employees to get to work while allowing Soldiers to conduct PT. There have been occasions where the PT route has not been followed. DOL identifies these occurrences to the Garrison CSM who coordinates with the applicable CSM(s) to implement corrective action.
Answer: 10 Mar: Building 2916 is located in the 3rd ID PT area. A route has been established that enables employees to get to work while allowing Soldiers to conduct PT. There have been occasions where the PT route has not been followed. DOL identifies these occurrences to the Garrison CSM who coordinates with the applicable CSM(s) to implement corrective action.
07 Mar 2012: Honeywell
Comment: Can we hold Honeywell accountable for bringing vehicles to us that are clean - apparently this has been an issue.
Answer: 10 Mar 12: Honeywell accepts LBE from units that are on a very short timeline from MRE completion and deployment. They require units to clean vehicles when possible but time constraints hinder some from being cleaned. Honeywell is not staffed nor do they have the resources available at all motor pools to conduct the cleaning. They have gotten better at providing clean vehicles over the past few months.
Answer: 10 Mar 12: Honeywell accepts LBE from units that are on a very short timeline from MRE completion and deployment. They require units to clean vehicles when possible but time constraints hinder some from being cleaned. Honeywell is not staffed nor do they have the resources available at all motor pools to conduct the cleaning. They have gotten better at providing clean vehicles over the past few months.
17 Feb 2012: Computers to schools
Comment: PLDC building vic DPTMS building. We are getting rid of 80 computers to DRMO. Before we do this let’s look to see if we can give them to DoDEA schools. Gentleman who brought this up sent the link below which he believes gives us auth to do this. http://computersforlearning.gov/htm/hp_eo12999.htm <http://computersforlearning.gov/htm/hp_eo12999.htm>
Answer: Per S6 coordination, schools are unable to accept these computers
Answer: Per S6 coordination, schools are unable to accept these computers
17 Feb 2012: Accident Report
Comment: MP Report for accident involving several parked cars seems to be held up. Let's get it moving and available to those involved.
Answer: Reports are complete.
Answer: Reports are complete.
17 Feb 2012: Gate 3
Comment: Guard on far right lane is not visible so everyone goes to the other lane as opposed to using both lanes. Let's get this fixed.
Answer: Guard repositioned for visibility
Answer: Guard repositioned for visibility
03 Nov 2011: Presidents Fitness
Comment: Need a Marne Message put out describing how to become a participant in the Presidential Fitness Challenge and how to sign up for our group.
Answer: 09 Feb 12 - All directorates provided instructions.
Answer: 09 Feb 12 - All directorates provided instructions.
04 Nov 2011: Safety Takeover Plan
Comment: We need to take a look at the Div Safety takeover plan. They are saying Jan but not sure this makes sense.
Answer: Transitioned 08 Dec 11.
Answer: Transitioned 08 Dec 11.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)